- #REAKTOR LIB HOW TO#
- #REAKTOR LIB UPDATE#
- #REAKTOR LIB PATCH#
- #REAKTOR LIB FULL#
- #REAKTOR LIB ANDROID#
NI was sold to a hard profit optimized company in USA as far as i know. I don´t now what happened in the meantime. I felt always an enthusiastic, motivated team behind Reaktor and i have no doubt it is true! This was so promising! Later, let it be 2018 or 2019, i don´t remember exactly, they made a promising survey about the future plans of Reaktor. In 2015 or 16, the Reaktor team made personal Video Interviews with beta testers / advanced builders (including me).
![reaktor lib reaktor lib](https://s1.studylibpl.com/store/data/000972279_1-df813c42fabe5f57fcf3e9ebf1bc2138.png)
At least since one year now! Precious time that had could be spent for true Reaktor development. The M1 compatibility issue seems to cost 100% of the Reaktor team´s time (seemingly officially confirmed). But what is happening today is a catastrophy. In 2018 or so, when High Sierra came out, it was some kind of a slight show stopper.
#REAKTOR LIB UPDATE#
I think everyone would benefit from the community having better communication/feedbacks with the team,but yah easier to just focus on the market and try to bring the most buyers possible.Ī lot of companies/devs have very good communication with the users when it comes to the software direction/updates,i think it's a shame we are left in the dark for the most part but every company has a different approach i guess.ĬolB: "What I'm pretty sure of is that software costs plenty of money to maintain - particularly in the context of Apple's update schedule." Razor was/is very successful and it comes from a musician/user at first who liked building stuff.
#REAKTOR LIB PATCH#
What you say is true if all is seen through the lens of "how can we sell more,get bigger and bigger" but then there's a danger of becoming very generic and not having an identity.Īnd i think people who can push the envelope,think differently are the ones opening up new possibilities,innovations.or at least they can help.You guys created patch cables before NI actually did it as a feature,maybe they noticed and it played a role? Reaktor's main identity is about building,modifying ensembles.i just hope the identity hasn't shifted to just selling the most commercial ensembles possible. I'd rather answer a question once, rather than once a week for each new user that has the same problem. Personally, I don't think Discord works well for in depth technical discussion that would ideally remain in an easily browsable form for the future, and facebook is. It's much quieter here than it used to be. Maybe more significant is the fracturing of the community between the Forum, facebook, and Discord. It's a shame Herwig and Don moved on, but really I don't think it matters much from NIs point of view, I doubt the majority of users even consider visiting the forum. I like Reaktor, I wish it was better, but the changes I want are not things that will directly bring in more users, at least not in the short term. at least that was my experience of Kontakt Player with one of the drummer packs I bought a few years ago. I know from experience that trying to get the most out of content using a 'Player' version can be quite frustrating.
#REAKTOR LIB FULL#
But I wouldn't be surprised if the vast majority of Reaktor users just use their full licence so they can fully access NI and 3rd party commercial content. The UL and community are good for marketing, in terms of differentiating Reaktor in the marketplace. Most folk maybe want quite different things from Reaktor. I'm sure NI have a good idea about their customer base, and I would imagine that the regulars here are outliers. Kind words thanks, but I really don't think we are particularly important in the grand scheme of things.
![reaktor lib reaktor lib](https://www.native-instruments.com/fileadmin/userlib/images/300659_6184.Dannenberg_Trumpet.jpg)
![reaktor lib reaktor lib](https://www.native-instruments.com/fileadmin/userlib/images/3142018_5177.transmog.jpg)
#REAKTOR LIB HOW TO#
The reactor has no dependency on the view, which makes it easily testable.The community here is very nice and we have very important builders who know how to improve the software,colB is one of them.but a few lost hope on being heard and have a useful update for building.Herw,Salamander. A view should not have any business related logic but rather delegate all user actions to the reactor and render its state.Ī view must implement the ReactorView interface: class ExampleFragment : Fragment(), ReactorView Ī reactor is an UI-independent class that manages the state of the view and handles business logic or redirects to services that handle business logic.
#REAKTOR LIB ANDROID#
In Android terms, a view could be an Activity, a Fragment, a ViewGroup or a View. Tell me more General Concept and Unidirectional Data FlowĪs seen in the previous graphic, there are two actors that interact with each other: the view and the reactor. Implementation "at.florianschuster.reaktor:reaktor-android-koin:$version" * Android (AAC) Koin Extensions for Reactor. Implementation "at.florianschuster.reaktor:reaktor-android:$version" Implementation "at.florianschuster.reaktor:reaktor-core:$version"
![reaktor lib reaktor lib](https://blog.native-instruments.com/wp-content/uploads/dynamic/2020/02/10-most-downloaded-ensembles-from-the-reaktor-user-library-in-2018-space-time-1125x0-c-default.jpg)
It is a Kotlin port of the ReaktorKit Swift concept. Reaktor is a framework for a reactive and unidirectional Kotlin application architecture. Use the coroutines version instead: control